Copyright, Trademark & Defamation — How to File a Notice and What We Will and Won’t Take Down
fishinglicenseguide.org/ respects intellectual property rights and complies with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 512). This page sets out how to file a copyright notice, how to file a counter-notice, our position on fair use of educational fishing-license content, our trademark and defamation frameworks, and what we cannot help with.
What’s on this page
- Designated agent
- Filing a DMCA notice
- Six required elements
- Counter-notice — § 512(g)
- Repeat-infringer policy — § 512(i)
- Misrepresentation — § 512(f)
- Fair use & educational fishing content
- Federal & state government works
- Trademark nominative fair use
- Defamation framework
- What we can’t help with
- Contact
1. Designated Agent
Our designated agent for receipt of DMCA notifications is reachable by email at info@fishinglicenseguide.org. Please use the subject line “DMCA notice” for takedown requests and “DMCA counter-notice” for counter-notifications. We process all notices submitted in good faith and that include the six statutory elements set out below.
2. Filing a DMCA Notice
If you believe content on fishinglicenseguide.org/ infringes a copyright you own or are authorised to enforce, send a written notice to the designated agent. The notice should be sent in plain text or PDF and include all six statutory elements.
3. Six Required Elements (17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3))
- Physical or electronic signature of the copyright owner, or a person authorised to act on the owner’s behalf.
- Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed — a specific work, or, if multiple works at the site are covered, a representative list.
- Identification of the allegedly infringing material — sufficient to permit us to locate it (full URLs to the specific guide or guides on fishinglicenseguide.org/, not the homepage).
- Reasonably sufficient contact information — your name, address, telephone number, and email.
- A good-faith statement that you have a good-faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorised by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
- An accuracy statement under penalty of perjury — that the information in the notification is accurate, and (under penalty of perjury) that you are authorised to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
Section 512(c)(3)(B) provides that a notification that fails to comply substantially with all six elements may not be considered when determining whether we have actual or apparent knowledge of infringement. We will, however, attempt to follow up if a notice is missing only routine details — but a fully compliant notice gets the fastest action.
4. Counter-Notice (17 U.S.C. § 512(g))
If your content was removed in response to a DMCA notice and you believe the removal was based on mistake or misidentification, you may file a counter-notice. A counter-notice must include:
- Your physical or electronic signature
- Identification of the material that was removed and the location at which it appeared before removal
- A statement under penalty of perjury that you have a good-faith belief that the material was removed as a result of mistake or misidentification
- Your name, address, and telephone number
- A statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal district court for the judicial district in which your address is located (or, if outside the U.S., for any judicial district in which fishinglicenseguide.org/ may be found), and that you will accept service of process from the person who submitted the original notice
If we receive a valid counter-notice, we will forward it to the original complainant. If the original complainant does not file a court action seeking a restraining order against the user within 10–14 business days of receipt of the counter-notice, we may restore the removed material.
5. Repeat-Infringer Policy (17 U.S.C. § 512(i))
fishinglicenseguide.org/ maintains a policy, in compliance with Section 512(i), of terminating in appropriate circumstances the access of users (including contributors and commenters) who are repeat infringers of copyright.
6. Misrepresentation Liability (17 U.S.C. § 512(f))
Section 512(f) provides that any person who knowingly materially misrepresents that material is infringing, or that material was removed by mistake or misidentification, may be liable for damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees. We take § 512(f) seriously. We will not entertain notices that appear to be filed in bad faith — including notices that target accurate use of nominative trademark references to state fish and wildlife agencies or federal authorities, or that target editorial commentary on regulatory conduct.
7. Fair Use & Educational Fishing-License Content (17 U.S.C. § 107)
Section 107 of the Copyright Act establishes the fair-use defence. The four statutory factors are: (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether it is for nonprofit educational purposes or transformative; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Describing fishing license requirements, summarising published fee schedules in our own words, walking readers through the steps of buying a license on a state agency’s portal, and describing season dates and creel limits in plain English is core educational fair use under § 107. Our walkthroughs are written in our own words. We do not reproduce state agency regulations digests verbatim. We do not reproduce copyrighted photographs, maps, or illustrations from agency publications. Where we briefly quote a phrase from a state regulations digest for direct comparison, we keep the quotation to the minimum necessary, attribute it explicitly, and link to the source.
8. Federal and State Government Works
Federal government works are generally not subject to copyright (17 U.S.C. § 105) — including most U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), NOAA Fisheries / National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Coast Guard, National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Bureau of Indian Affairs publications. Many state government works are similarly available for non-commercial reuse with attribution under each state’s open-records or transparency framework, though the rules vary state by state. We comply with each state’s stated reuse policy and link to the original published page rather than reproducing it.
9. Trademark — Nominative Fair Use
We use the names of state fish and wildlife agencies and federal authorities — for example, “California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW),” “Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC),” “Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD),” “New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC),” “Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC),” “Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW),” “Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC),” “Michigan Department of Natural Resources,” “Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources,” “Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,” “North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC),” “Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division,” “Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources,” “Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G),” “Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD),” “Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (AGFC),” “Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW),” “Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP),” “Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources,” “Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG),” “Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR),” “Indiana Department of Natural Resources Fish & Wildlife,” “Iowa Department of Natural Resources,” “Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks (KDWP),” “Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR),” “Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF),” “Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW),” “Maryland Department of Natural Resources,” “Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (MassWildlife),” “Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks (MDWFP),” “Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP),” “Nebraska Game and Parks Commission,” “Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW),” “New Hampshire Fish and Game Department,” “New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife,” “New Mexico Department of Game and Fish,” “North Dakota Game and Fish Department,” “Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife,” “Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (ODWC),” “Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management,” “South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR),” “South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks,” “Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA),” “Utah Division of Wildlife Resources,” “Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department,” “Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources,” “Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW),” “West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (WVDNR),” “Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD),” and the federal authorities “U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,” “NOAA Fisheries,” “National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS),” “U.S. Coast Guard,” “National Park Service,” “U.S. Forest Service,” “Bureau of Land Management,” and “Bureau of Indian Affairs” — to identify the agency our guide covers.
This is nominative fair use. Under the Ninth Circuit’s framework in New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing, Inc., 971 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1992) and subsequent case law, nominative use is permitted where (a) the product or service in question is not readily identifiable without use of the trademark, (b) only so much of the mark is used as is reasonably necessary, and (c) the user does nothing that would suggest sponsorship or endorsement by the mark holder. We meet all three requirements.
If you are the mark holder for a referenced agency or authority and you believe our use exceeds nominative fair use, email us with subject line “Trademark concern” — we respond within 5 business days. We will not entertain trademark objections that are functionally objections to accurate identification of the agency our editorial content describes.
10. Defamation Framework
Defamation requires a false statement of fact published with the relevant degree of fault. Our content is editorial reporting on fishing license requirements — fee tables, walkthroughs, season dates, free fishing days, and procedural descriptions. We rarely have occasion to publish defamation-relevant content; when we do reference state agencies, federal authorities, or wildlife enforcement officers, we attribute statements to the official record and we correct factual errors when shown they are factual errors.
For matters of public concern, the U.S. Supreme Court’s framework in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) requires public officials to prove “actual malice” (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth). Senior officials at state fish and wildlife agencies, federal authorities, and wildlife enforcement officers acting in their official capacity are typically public officials or public figures for Sullivan purposes when commentary concerns institutional conduct. For private figures involved in matters of public concern, Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974) and its progeny require at least a showing of fault.
We report on regulatory practice. We attribute. We correct factual errors. We do not retract accurate content in response to objections from people who don’t like that the content is accurate. If you believe a statement on the site is factually incorrect, email us with subject line “Defamation concern” or “Correction” — provide the page URL, the specific statement, and the source you believe shows it is incorrect. We respond within 7 business days.
11. What We Can’t Help With
- We can’t remove regulations from a state fish and wildlife agency’s published page — we describe what the agency publishes; the agency is the authority
- We can’t remove accurate content drawn from public agency pages
- We can’t remove information about you from any state license database — that’s the agency’s record; you must contact the agency directly
- We can’t represent you in litigation against any third party — consult a lawyer
- We can’t process license purchases, fee payments, or any agency transaction
- We can’t remove your search history from search engines — that’s between you and the search engine
12. Contact
For DMCA notices: info@fishinglicenseguide.org with subject line “DMCA notice”.
For counter-notices: subject line “DMCA counter-notice”.
For trademark concerns: subject line “Trademark concern”.
For defamation concerns: subject line “Defamation concern” or “Correction”.
Need to File a DMCA Notice or Counter-Notice?
Email us with the appropriate subject line. Include all six statutory elements for fastest action. We process valid notices within 5 business days.
📧 info@fishinglicenseguide.org